Introduction to SQUG
The purpose of this web page is to answer the following questions about the Seismic Qualification Utility Group or "SQUG" and how the experience-based methods may be used for seismic qualification of nuclear power plant equipment.
Companies interested in SQUG membership are invited to
contact Dr. Robert Kassawara, the EPRI Program Manager, at
SQUG is an organization of companies that either own or operate nuclear power plants or other nuclear facilities. The 33 members of SQUG, including 17 international companies, that are currently members of SQUG are listed below:
In 2003, the Seismic Experience-based Qualification (SEQUAL) Owners Group agreed to combine with SQUG. SEQUAL had originally formed to implement the experience-based seismic equipment qualification methodology for non-USI A-46 nuclear power plants. Therefore after merging, the combined organization was sometimes referred to as “SQUG/SEQUAL.” However, since 2010 the combined organization is referred to simply as SQUG.
The experience-based method was originally developed by SQUG to provide a practical, cost-effective alternative to shake table testing and dynamic analysis to seismically qualify safety-related equipment installed in older U.S. nuclear power plants in response to the USNRC Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46. International utilities also had to address similar requirements from their regulatory bodies to verify the seismic adequacy of equipment installed before more stringent seismic qualification methods were required. The SQUG methodology has been adapted as a cost-effective alternative for qualifying new and replacement equipment in the U.S. and internationally.
The method developed by SQUG is based on experience data obtained from the performance of equipment during earthquakes, supplemented by shake table test data. The methodology includes guidelines and criteria to screen out equipment that is similar to the equipment that performed well during earthquakes and shake table tests. The screening evaluations verify that the seismic capacity of the equipment exceeds the seismic demand that could be imposed on that equipment. A check is made to verify that the anchorage is adequate and that the equipment is not subject to adverse seismic interaction from nearby equipment and structures. The method includes guidelines and criteria to screen out from further consideration electrical relays that could be susceptible to “contact chatter" during seismic events. All these methods are documented in the Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), developed by SQUG. The GIP includes all these guidelines and criteria in a comprehensive set of procedures with checklists.
Those items of equipment that do not pass the GIP screens are defined as “outliers.” Such items will not necessarily fail during a seismic event, but they simply fail to meet the conservative GIP screening criteria but may be shown to be adequate with further evaluations. SQUG has additional documents and methods for further evaluating outliers.
The GIP methodology can be applied to 20 "classes" of electric and mechanical equipment (e.g., pumps, valves, compressors, electrical cabinets, switchgear, and generators). The GIP also includes screening guidelines and criteria for evaluating relays, tanks, heat exchangers, and electrical cable and conduit raceways. In addition to these guidelines and criteria in the GIP, SQUG has recently developed guidelines and criteria for other classes of equipment including piping systems, HVAC systems, and overhead Cranes. Additional classes of equipment may be added in the future.
The SQUG method is also being applied for seismic qualification, design, and procurement of new and replacement equipment (NARE). The NARE Guidelines describe how to adapt the GIP guidelines and criteria including checklists for performing evaluations and developing procurement specifications.
For installed equipment, the experience-based method is a practical and cost effective method for seismic qualification, compared to dynamic analysis and testing. The cost savings for each of the U.S. 36 plants that were originally required to address USI A-46 is estimated to be more than U.S. $10 million. In addition, continued use of SQUG method for new and replacement equipment (NARE) is expected to save each nuclear unit on average about U.S. $500,000 per year. One of the principal benefits of using the SQUG methods for NARE is that the seismic evaluations can be completed relatively quickly, compared to performing analyses or shake-table testing. This reduces procurement time because commercial grade equipment can be used. Operability determinations, while nuclear units are on-line, can also be performed using the GIP method, thus avoiding potential shutdowns due to Technical Specification Limiting Condition of Operations (LCOs).
Each SQUG member has access to the products, tools, training, and engineering/management support for use in implementing the SQUG methodology at their facilities. Engineering contractors hired by a SQUG member may also gain access to these resources and tools to support the SQUG member in applying the experience-based seismic qualification methods. Listed below are some of the benefits of SQUG membership:
· Copies of the current Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) are available, along with past and future updates.
· Multiple sets, as needed, of the SQUG/EPRI reference reports are available. These reports provide the background and data covering the earthquake experience database, anchorage evaluations, relay evaluations, in-cabinet amplification, storage tank and heat exchanger evaluation, and electric cable trays evaluation. A list of these SQUG/EPRI reports and instructions for obtaining copies are included in Chapter 6 of the SQUG Catalog of Products and Services.
· Software for implementing certain analytical portions of the method is available, including codes that determine in-cabinet amplification factors for relays, equipment anchorage evaluations, and management of safe shutdown equipment lists for use with the GIP.
· SQUG occasionally offers sessions of SQUG training courses. There is a minimal or reduced tuition cost to take these courses, depending upon how many other members also want to send students to the course. The courses that SQUG has developed include the following:
- Walkdown Screening and Seismic Evaluation Training Course (5-days)
- Safe Shutdown Equipment Selection Course (2-days -- given in conjunction with the Electrical Relay Evaluation Course)
- Electrical Relay Evaluation Course (2-days -- given in conjunction with the Safe Shutdown Equipment Selection Course)
- Application of Experience Based Method to Seismic Qualification of New and Replacement Equipment (NARE) Course (2-days)
- SQUG/NARE Awareness Training Course (1/2-day)
· SQUG has developed videos on the topics listed below. These may be viewed here.
- SQUG Walkdown Course Excerpts – Introduction and Background
- Introduction to SQUG Web Site
- Questions & Answer Forums on SQUG Web Site
- Differences Between NTTF 2.3 Seismic and USI A-46
- Seismic Housekeeping
- Seismic Verification of HVAC Duct and Damper Systems
- Seismic Verification of Piping and Tubing
- Seismic Verification of Overhead Cranes
· Self-Training Package for SQUG Walkdown Screening and Seismic Evaluation Training Course – This self-contained training program allows SQUG member to administer a session of the "Walkdown Course" at their own facility. This training package includes:
- A set of DVDs that cover the principal lectures for the week-long course. Total running time for the DVDs is more than 14 hours.
- A set of CDs containing the material needed to administer the course including:
○ Student Workbook
○ Classroom hand-outs
○ Case studies
○ Course Administrator’s Manual with instructions and a suggested schedule for conducting the course, which typically takes 5 days.
· Access to the SQUG Subject Matter Experts for assistance in answering questions about applying the experience-based seismic qualification methodology.
· Subscription to the SQUG newsletter.
· Voting rights at the annual SQUG Meeting on actions to be taken by the group and the annual budget of expenditures.
· Participation by a representative at the annual SQUG meeting.
· Access to the SQUG web site (http://squgweb.mpr.com), including access to the private sections of the web site for "members only".
· Access to the web site containing the SQUG Earthquake Experience Database (http://www.epriq.com/esqug/). The earthquake experience database on this web site can be used to verify that equipment has the attributes of the equipment that successfully withstood the effects of real earthquakes. This is the data that was used to initially develop the guidelines contained in the GIP.
· Access to support from SQUG for implementing plant-specific, seismic qualification of new and replacement equipment using the SQUG method.
· Access to other SQUG utility members in the U.S. and internationally using the SQUG List Server (SQUGLIST). SQUG member representatives also have access to and can interface with other members during annual SQUG meetings. Since all of the U.S. members and most of the international members have used the SQUG method extensively at their plants, they have extensive knowledge in how to apply the generic method to plant-specific applications. Interaction with other members can also allow others to implement elements of the SQUG method easier and faster. The collective experience of the membership, in conjunction with use of the SQUG method for USI A-46 and new and replacement equipment, can provide a cost effective way to apply the SQUG method.
· Access to other SQUG experience-based guidelines for evaluation the seismic adequacy of other systems and equipment beyond those covered in the GIP including:
- Overhead Crane Guidelines
- Piping and Tubing Guidelines
- HVAC Duct and Damper System Guidelines
- Experience-Based Seismic Equipment Qualification (EBSEQ) for Commercial Application (a.k.a. Commercial GIP)
- Benchmarking for Seismic Housekeeping at Nuclear Power Plants – Compilation of Industry Practices
- Portable Equipment Seismic Verification
Last Updated: 5/8/2018
Copyright © 2001 – 2018 SQUG. All rights reserved.
Questions or comments? E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.